Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
20,682
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 82:
Line 82: + +
→United States: reply
Amnesty Intl is not a reputable source, more in line with a liberalism agenda.--'''<font color="#6698FF">J</font><font color="#E41B17">p</font><font color="#F88017">a</font><font color="#347C17">t</font><font color="#A74AC7">t</font>'''<sup>[[User:Jpatt| ]]</sup> 16:28, 24 October 2008 (EDT)
Amnesty Intl is not a reputable source, more in line with a liberalism agenda.--'''<font color="#6698FF">J</font><font color="#E41B17">p</font><font color="#F88017">a</font><font color="#347C17">t</font><font color="#A74AC7">t</font>'''<sup>[[User:Jpatt| ]]</sup> 16:28, 24 October 2008 (EDT)
:AI is not a reputable source? Then please tell me an organization that tracks matters such as this that would be a reputable org. [[User:NateE|NateE]]<sup>[[User talk:NateE| Let Us Communicate]]</sup> 16:32, 24 October 2008 (EDT)
:AI is not a reputable source? Then please tell me an organization that tracks matters such as this that would be a reputable org. [[User:NateE|NateE]]<sup>[[User talk:NateE| Let Us Communicate]]</sup> 16:32, 24 October 2008 (EDT)
::Correct, not a reputable source. Sorry, I am not mistaken. I don't know who is reputable but I know who is not. Don't use Human Rights Watch either, another liberalism agenda. If you want to make America look bad, try Wikipedia. --'''<font color="#6698FF">J</font><font color="#E41B17">p</font><font color="#F88017">a</font><font color="#347C17">t</font><font color="#A74AC7">t</font>'''<sup>[[User:Jpatt| ]]</sup> 16:42, 24 October 2008 (EDT)