5,580
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 86:
Line 86: +
→United States
:::I didn't add the information in question, but if you're going to claim that any source is non a good example, you should at least be able to give some examples of who would be acceptable. [[User:NateE|NateE]]<sup>[[User talk:NateE| Let Us Communicate]]</sup> 16:51, 24 October 2008 (EDT)
:::I didn't add the information in question, but if you're going to claim that any source is non a good example, you should at least be able to give some examples of who would be acceptable. [[User:NateE|NateE]]<sup>[[User talk:NateE| Let Us Communicate]]</sup> 16:51, 24 October 2008 (EDT)
:::: I know you didn't add the statement. I agree with you that if I find source unacceptable, I should be able to tell you a source, but I am not a person that digs for dirt on Old Glory. Try contributing more and less talk because you are borderline on the 90/10 rule.--'''<font color="#6698FF">J</font><font color="#E41B17">p</font><font color="#F88017">a</font><font color="#347C17">t</font><font color="#A74AC7">t</font>'''<sup>[[User:Jpatt| ]]</sup> 16:58, 24 October 2008 (EDT)
:::: I know you didn't add the statement. I agree with you that if I find source unacceptable, I should be able to tell you a source, but I am not a person that digs for dirt on Old Glory. Try contributing more and less talk because you are borderline on the 90/10 rule.--'''<font color="#6698FF">J</font><font color="#E41B17">p</font><font color="#F88017">a</font><font color="#347C17">t</font><font color="#A74AC7">t</font>'''<sup>[[User:Jpatt| ]]</sup> 16:58, 24 October 2008 (EDT)
::::::So in other words, no source in line with the so-called "liberal agenda" is reputable (by assertion), and if such source does exist, you don't know about it therefore we can't use it? Do you have any actual evidence why AI or HRW are disreputable, or is it just because they are liberal? [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 17:31, 24 October 2008 (EDT) PS: I'm nowhere near 90/10