Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Graphic!: the human soul
Line 65: Line 65:  
[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Human_reproduction&oldid=517009 I just reverted to his version] [[User:BHarlan|BHarlan]] 14:54, 23 October 2008 (EDT)
 
[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Human_reproduction&oldid=517009 I just reverted to his version] [[User:BHarlan|BHarlan]] 14:54, 23 October 2008 (EDT)
 
:I don't agree, but I also don't have the stamina to argue it. However, please be careful when reverting that you don't revert helpful intermediate edits. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 17:32, 23 October 2008 (EDT)
 
:I don't agree, but I also don't have the stamina to argue it. However, please be careful when reverting that you don't revert helpful intermediate edits. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 17:32, 23 October 2008 (EDT)
 +
::HelpJazz, I noticed you removed the comment about when the human soul enters the picture. I understand your earlier edit comments saying it should be described separately from the biological aspects, so I expected you to place it elsewhere on the page. However, the comment was removed entirely. The soul is an inherent step in the process of human reproducation. Otherwise, without a soul, at which point does it become a human life? The soul appears at conception, for if it didn't then there would be no problem with abortion because you'd just be "terminating" something without a soul, akin to an animal. -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 21:46, 24 October 2008 (EDT)
4,781

edits

Navigation menu