34
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 15:
Line 15: − +
Debate: Is it possible for God to be timeless? (view source)
Revision as of 02:46, October 25, 2008
, 02:46, October 25, 2008→Yes
::But mixing omnipresence with general relativity implies that God is a physical part of the universe. Anyway general relativity would require that something without movement cannot progress in time, which doesnt allow for timelessness so much as a lack of a continuum for God to cause within.
::But mixing omnipresence with general relativity implies that God is a physical part of the universe. Anyway general relativity would require that something without movement cannot progress in time, which doesnt allow for timelessness so much as a lack of a continuum for God to cause within.
I can understand how omnipresence might work, but it makes God a part of nature rather than the separate creator of the universe. -Barnes
::I can understand how omnipresence might work, but it makes God a part of nature rather than the separate creator of the universe. -Barnes
== I don't know, and nor do you ==
== I don't know, and nor do you ==