Changes

===Amazon.com review===

===Amazon.com review===

When reviewers on shopping site Amazon.com gave her book "Blood Canticle" bad reviews in September 2004, Anne Rice herself left a lengthy comment defending the book and claiming (among other things) that the authors of the negative reviews "are interrogating this text from the wrong perspective".

When reviewers on shopping site [[Amazon.com]] gave her book "Blood Canticle" bad reviews in September 2004, Anne Rice herself left a lengthy comment defending the book and claiming (among other things) that the authors of the negative reviews "are interrogating this text from the wrong perspective".

The comment and the replies to it were later pulled from the site, to the surprise of both the fans and Rice herself.<ref>[http://www.annerice.com/msg092604a.htm Post on AnneRice.com]</ref> However, copies of the review have spread across the Internet.<ref>[http://www.journalfen.net/community/fandom_wank/515245.html?nc=911 Fandom Wank community entry] on LiveJournal</ref>

The comment and the replies to it were later pulled from the site, to the surprise of both the fans and Rice herself.<ref>[http://www.annerice.com/msg092604a.htm Post on AnneRice.com]</ref> However, copies of the review have spread across the Internet.<ref>[http://www.journalfen.net/community/fandom_wank/515245.html?nc=911 Fandom Wank community entry] on LiveJournal</ref>

Author Neil Gaiman commented on the issue on his blog:<ref>[http://journal.neilgaiman.com/2004/09/de-gustibus-and-how-to-reply-to-bad.asp "De Gustibus, and how to reply to bad reviews"]</ref>

Author [[Neil Gaiman]] commented on the issue on his blog:<ref>[http://journal.neilgaiman.com/2004/09/de-gustibus-and-how-to-reply-to-bad.asp "De Gustibus, and how to reply to bad reviews"]</ref>

{{cquote|I think that unless a reviewer gets their facts completely wrong, the author should shut up (and even then, the author should probably let it go -- although I'm a big fan of a letter that James Branch Cabell wrote to the New York Times pointing out that their review of FIGURES OF EARTH was bollocks*). As Kingsley Amis said, a bad review may spoil your breakfast, but you shouldn't let it spoil your lunch.<br>[...]<br>I think Anne Rice going on Amazon and lambasting her critics was undoubtedly a very brave and satisfying thing for her to do, was every bit as sensible as kicking a tar baby, and, if ever I do something like that, please shoot me.}}

{{cquote|I think that unless a reviewer gets their facts completely wrong, the author should shut up (and even then, the author should probably let it go -- although I'm a big fan of a letter that James Branch Cabell wrote to the New York Times pointing out that their review of FIGURES OF EARTH was bollocks*). As Kingsley Amis said, a bad review may spoil your breakfast, but you shouldn't let it spoil your lunch.<br>[...]<br>I think Anne Rice going on Amazon and lambasting her critics was undoubtedly a very brave and satisfying thing for her to do, was every bit as sensible as kicking a tar baby, and, if ever I do something like that, please shoot me.}}