3,303
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 5:
Line 5: − − ::Abstinence only education doesn't work because of the forbidden fruit effect (for an example, see Prohibition). Teens just don't listen, hell I'm only seventeen and I understand that. Abstinence only, like Communism, requires that human nature change completely and abruptly and that is impossible. Comprehensive Sex Education gives teens information that can actually be useful such as contraceptives, STDs, STD prevention. It also teaches that abstinence is also okay and someone's choice. But it isn't taught exclusively and used as a crutch to misinform teenagers.[[User:JudgeKing|JudgeKing]] 13:37, 25 October 2008 (EDT)
Undo revision 542752 by JudgeKing (Talk)
:This doesn't seem very conservative. It's all about how ineffective abstinance education is. Probably true, but irrelivant: Conservatives know that sex ed is about more than safe sex, it's about promoting moral values and Christian virtue. Comprehensive sex ed may keep the teens safe from pregnency and STI, but at the expense of turning them away from God, so we need to give our full support to abstinance. I urge a rewrite to strip all the pro-sex and anti-abstinance parts - which leaves three paragraphs. [[User:NewCrusader|NewCrusader]] 18:12, 29 September 2008 (EDT)
:This doesn't seem very conservative. It's all about how ineffective abstinance education is. Probably true, but irrelivant: Conservatives know that sex ed is about more than safe sex, it's about promoting moral values and Christian virtue. Comprehensive sex ed may keep the teens safe from pregnency and STI, but at the expense of turning them away from God, so we need to give our full support to abstinance. I urge a rewrite to strip all the pro-sex and anti-abstinance parts - which leaves three paragraphs. [[User:NewCrusader|NewCrusader]] 18:12, 29 September 2008 (EDT)
== Where did this article go? ==
== Where did this article go? ==