604
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 50:
Line 50: + +
Talk:Photoelectric effect (view source)
Revision as of 22:32, October 26, 2008
, 22:32, October 26, 2008→Timeline
:::: So Planck praised Einstein. Maybe Einstein deserved being elected to that group. I am not disputing that. Maybe Einstein said something about light quanta that Planck did not fully agree with. Planck does not say who deserves credit for quantizing light. Even if he did, the more significant fact is that Planck published five years earlier. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 18:14, 26 October 2008 (EDT)
:::: So Planck praised Einstein. Maybe Einstein deserved being elected to that group. I am not disputing that. Maybe Einstein said something about light quanta that Planck did not fully agree with. Planck does not say who deserves credit for quantizing light. Even if he did, the more significant fact is that Planck published five years earlier. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 18:14, 26 October 2008 (EDT)
::::: And Newton published 200 years earlier about light existing from ''corpuscles''. But neither Planck nor Newton published an the ''photoelectric effect'', using light-quanta. You may not like it, but Planck, Born, the Nobel committee, gave Einstein credit for his explanation - Lenard, of course, did not, not so much because of a priority dispute but as he didn't accept the ''jüdische Physik'' ... --[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 18:32, 26 October 2008 (EDT)