1,035
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 293:
Line 293: +
Talk:Counterexamples to Evolution (view source)
Revision as of 02:55, October 27, 2008
, 02:55, October 27, 2008→Beauty
[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 22:49, 26 October 2008 (EDT)
[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 22:49, 26 October 2008 (EDT)
: Aschlafly already explained it to you clearly, Phil. Beauty cannot result from evolution, as it cannot result from chance. Please stop repeating the same unrelated points and open your mind to this fact. As for Bible's use of the word, yes, it necessarily uses the word "as commonly used." Vague definitions is a favorite method of liberal deceit. God's word is inerrant, and thus does not mislead with vagueries. [[User:RodWeathers|RodWeathers]] 22:55, 26 October 2008 (EDT)
The old saw is an atheistic falsehood, which is traced to statements by a young Benjamin Franklin (before he returned to [[faith]]) and by [[David Hume]], an early atheistic philosopher. See [http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/59100.html]. Looks like it has misled many who are unaware of its atheistic roots.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:54, 26 October 2008 (EDT)
The old saw is an atheistic falsehood, which is traced to statements by a young Benjamin Franklin (before he returned to [[faith]]) and by [[David Hume]], an early atheistic philosopher. See [http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/59100.html]. Looks like it has misled many who are unaware of its atheistic roots.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:54, 26 October 2008 (EDT)