::: Now it is ''theoretically possible'' that the sentence is in a context where there is a cat, and elsewhere creationists have admitted that the odd ''extremely rare'' information-gaining mutation might occur, so even if the Nylon bug is one, it's about the only one (and it's about the only one people keep telling me about), whereas if evolution was true, there should be ''many'' examples. And the odd very rare such mutation is going to be swamped by all the information-destroying ones, so it offers little comfort to evolution. By the way, the article you linked to is ''not'' a response to the one I linked to, although it does have a link to such a response. | ::: Now it is ''theoretically possible'' that the sentence is in a context where there is a cat, and elsewhere creationists have admitted that the odd ''extremely rare'' information-gaining mutation might occur, so even if the Nylon bug is one, it's about the only one (and it's about the only one people keep telling me about), whereas if evolution was true, there should be ''many'' examples. And the odd very rare such mutation is going to be swamped by all the information-destroying ones, so it offers little comfort to evolution. By the way, the article you linked to is ''not'' a response to the one I linked to, although it does have a link to such a response. |