Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
6,613
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 17:
Line 17: − +
Debate: Is it possible for God to be timeless? (view source)
Revision as of 16:58, October 27, 2008
, 16:58, October 27, 2008→Yes: Capital He for God
::I can understand how omnipresence might work, but it makes God a part of nature rather than the separate creator of the universe. -Barnes
::I can understand how omnipresence might work, but it makes God a part of nature rather than the separate creator of the universe. -Barnes
:::I disagree that omnipresence makes God a physical part of the universe. If he was both omnipresent and physically present, there wouldn't be any room for anything else, would there?.--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 12:56, 27 October 2008 (EDT)
:::I disagree that omnipresence makes God a physical part of the universe. If He was both omnipresent and physically present, there wouldn't be any room for anything else, would there?.--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 12:56, 27 October 2008 (EDT)
== I don't know, and nor do you ==
== I don't know, and nor do you ==