Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:Counterexamples to Evolution (view source)

Revision as of 02:51, October 28, 2008

576 bytes added ,  02:51, October 28, 2008
reply to Philip
Line 305: Line 305:  
: Nevertheless, the existence of a saying does not mean that it's true.  It may not be, but it appears to have a fair bit of truth simply by the ''fact'' that some see beauty where others do not.
 
: Nevertheless, the existence of a saying does not mean that it's true.  It may not be, but it appears to have a fair bit of truth simply by the ''fact'' that some see beauty where others do not.
 
: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 02:12, 27 October 2008 (EDT)
 
: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 02:12, 27 October 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
:: No, Philip, Shakespeare did not say that beauty is in the eye of the beholder.  That is obviously an atheistic saying that you repeated, as I pointed out.  It's time to concede that point.
 +
 +
:: Earlier you seemed to think that evolution could explain the undeniable beauty in autumn foliage, but it plainly can't.  The color arrangement arose before man and has no plausible evolutionary purpose.  Survival of the fittest to produce such beauty?  It's absurd, and thus remains as a counterexample familiar to all.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:51, 27 October 2008 (EDT)
    
== Sarfati reference ==
 
== Sarfati reference ==
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,953

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/544207"

Navigation menu