32
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 3:
Line 3: +
no edit summary
::Glad that you agree. Christian language is important.--[[User:Sherman|Sherman]] 11:31, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
::Glad that you agree. Christian language is important.--[[User:Sherman|Sherman]] 11:31, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
:::Christian language is important, but understanding actual scientific causation is probably more important to your ultimate educational goals :-/ -[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 11:32, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
:::Christian language is important, but understanding actual scientific causation is probably more important to your ultimate educational goals :-/ -[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 11:32, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
::::Your version of the article is a disgrace. It's not 'simply called' act of god. That's the ver nature of 'natural disasters'.--[[User:Sherman|Sherman]] 11:36, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
If God exists, wouldn't it be God's work that defines natural? Wouldn't everything God does be natural? [[User:What|What]]
If God exists, wouldn't it be God's work that defines natural? Wouldn't everything God does be natural? [[User:What|What]]