Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 23: Line 23:     
If anyone has a citation for the number of Muslims in China, then a reliable, ''cited'' estimate of that number would be welcome. But not ''without'' a citation.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 19:52, 9 October 2008 (EDT)
 
If anyone has a citation for the number of Muslims in China, then a reliable, ''cited'' estimate of that number would be welcome. But not ''without'' a citation.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 19:52, 9 October 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
==Liberal Vandalism==
 +
It seems that some people have managed to insert liberal bias into the article. For example, why does so much of the article present China as though it is an increasingly prosperous nation? What about the human rights issues? What about the fact that nothing has changed the fact that the nation is essentially '''morally bankrupt''' and that this situation will '''not''' change in the foreseeable future? [[User:Handels584|Handels584]] 08:30, 28 October 2008 (EDT)
30

edits

Navigation menu