nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + + + + + + + + + +
→RodWeather's edit: new section
{{Wikiproject Religion}}
{{Wikiproject Religion}}
== RodWeather's edit ==
RodWeather added: ''Regardless, Ussher's calculations were somewhat accurate, and the roughly 6000 year age of the world has been built upon by more recent scholarship and backed up by recent scientific research in [[creation science]].''
I have a few problems with this:
* The first part about the calculations being accurate is expressing an opinion. I agree with the opinion, and Conservapedia does express opinions at times, but we should keep it to a minimum and I don't think it's necessary in this case.
* The bit about being built upon by more recent scholarship is rather vague as to what it's referring to. As worded at the moment I don't think it means much, but perhaps it could be made clearer.
* Creation science has produced lots of evidence that is more consistent with a "young" Earth than one billions of years old, but they don't claim to be able to support ''scientifically'' an age as specific as around 6,000 years.
[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 05:13, 30 October 2008 (EDT)