nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + + +
Talk:Gregorian Calendar (view source)
Revision as of 06:07, October 31, 2008
, 06:07, October 31, 2008Start of year; Julian date vs. Julian calendar.
It is unclear to me if the Julian calendar is the same as the Gregorian apart from the leap year. From what I understand at its inception 2000 years ago, the months were in different placements. When I hear reference to a Julian date now, it's always as a specific number of days in the year such as day 283 in the Julian calendar. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 01:34, 31 October 2008 (EDT)
It is unclear to me if the Julian calendar is the same as the Gregorian apart from the leap year. From what I understand at its inception 2000 years ago, the months were in different placements. When I hear reference to a Julian date now, it's always as a specific number of days in the year such as day 283 in the Julian calendar. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 01:34, 31 October 2008 (EDT)
: The year used to start with March (which, if I recall correctly, is A), why there was the "Ides of March", the start of the new year; B) September to December are based on the numbers 7 to 10; C) the leap day (29th February) was the last day of the year), but I'm not sure whether that changed with the Gregorian Calendar or separately. Some research is needed, I guess.
: A "Julian date" is a different concept to the "Julian calendar". The former is a way of referring to a date simply by a number. There's probably some connection between the two, but they're not the same thing.
: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 02:07, 31 October 2008 (EDT)