276
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 16:
Line 16: + +
Talk:Essay:Women wearing pants (view source)
Revision as of 04:04, November 2, 2008
, 04:04, November 2, 2008issue of the history given
That said, isn't this a non-issue? When I look at paintings and drawings of men in Biblical times they're not wearing pants, but they weren't cross-dressing (nor are Scotsmen in traditional garb). Form follows function, which is why nurses wear scrubs instead of the starched white dress and pointed hat that was the norm as late as the 1970's --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 14:45, 10 June 2008 (EDT)
That said, isn't this a non-issue? When I look at paintings and drawings of men in Biblical times they're not wearing pants, but they weren't cross-dressing (nor are Scotsmen in traditional garb). Form follows function, which is why nurses wear scrubs instead of the starched white dress and pointed hat that was the norm as late as the 1970's --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 14:45, 10 June 2008 (EDT)
The history is a bit debatable - what are bloomers if not pants? And Audrey Hepburn was much later than 1857. [[User:Canuck|Canuck]] 00:04, 2 November 2008 (EDT)