Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,790
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 200:
Line 200: + +
Talk:PNAS Response to Letter (view source)
Revision as of 00:26, November 3, 2008
, 00:26, November 3, 2008→Have we given up?: evolution syndrome not allowed here
::::More importantly, I don't see how Aschlafly can give up on an argument he started. It's plain from what KennyMac and other wrote that his Point 5 is not correct. Now, is he going to do CP readers the favour of reaching a rational conclusion to this discussion or is he going to resort to his ploy of blocking contributors with whom he doesn't agree? [[User:DavyJones|DavyJones]] 20:03, 1 November 2008 (EDT)
::::More importantly, I don't see how Aschlafly can give up on an argument he started. It's plain from what KennyMac and other wrote that his Point 5 is not correct. Now, is he going to do CP readers the favour of reaching a rational conclusion to this discussion or is he going to resort to his ploy of blocking contributors with whom he doesn't agree? [[User:DavyJones|DavyJones]] 20:03, 1 November 2008 (EDT)
::::: "DavyJones" you're making false statements here and that will not be allowed. Point 5 is confirmed and you've provided nothing meaningful to rebut it. Also, [[evolution syndrome]] is not allowed here either. If you do not contribute in a meaningful way to non-evolution entries in this encyclopedia, then your account will be blocked.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 19:26, 2 November 2008 (EST)