Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 110:
Line 110: + +
Talk:Geocentric theory (view source)
Revision as of 18:41, November 3, 2008
, 18:41, November 3, 2008My response to an 18-month old comment
: You say "There is no direct way to test whether or not the earth is moving", and the article says something similar. You cite the Bible, and the article has Bible quotes. What's the problem? The problem with your links is that they have too much crackpot stuff in them, and are not good sources on the subject. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 13:16, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
: You say "There is no direct way to test whether or not the earth is moving", and the article says something similar. You cite the Bible, and the article has Bible quotes. What's the problem? The problem with your links is that they have too much crackpot stuff in them, and are not good sources on the subject. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 13:16, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
If, as evolution supports claim, the most brain-dead views on astronomy are held by [[Biblical literalists]], then it should be easy to provide some documentation on their views. Please add to the [[Biblical literalism]] article some background on people and/or churches who accept the 6-day account in Genesis literally; and show how this informs their modern views on astronomy. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 13:41, 3 November 2008 (EST)
== Important elements to include in the Article ==
== Important elements to include in the Article ==