Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Jupiter moons: What else would it be?
Line 292: Line 292:     
::::::: Ah, that makes more sense now.  But I'd go back to asking you to justify that.  You've asked Samd to justify his changes (and that's okay), but what's your justification for claiming that geocentricism ''is'' giving bodies co-ordinates relative to Earth.  Certainly I agree that it would ''do'' that, but don't agree that it ''is'' that, as though that defines it.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 03:30, 4 November 2008 (EST)
 
::::::: Ah, that makes more sense now.  But I'd go back to asking you to justify that.  You've asked Samd to justify his changes (and that's okay), but what's your justification for claiming that geocentricism ''is'' giving bodies co-ordinates relative to Earth.  Certainly I agree that it would ''do'' that, but don't agree that it ''is'' that, as though that defines it.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 03:30, 4 November 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
:::::::: What else would it be? Samd's definition was slightly different, but also less precise, and it is unclear whether he was trying to say something different. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 13:17, 4 November 2008 (EST)

Navigation menu