1,558
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: +
no edit summary
Are we edit warring about weather the beating was brutal or not? Let's pick bigger battles. (Like the flippant attitude of the article in general, which borders on racism...) [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 19:00, 5 November 2008 (EST)
Are we edit warring about weather the beating was brutal or not? Let's pick bigger battles. (Like the flippant attitude of the article in general, which borders on racism...) [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 19:00, 5 November 2008 (EST)
:I noticed that myself.... I will work on improving this tomorrow. [[User:SamuelA|SamuelA]] 20:03, 5 November 2008 (EST)
:I noticed that myself.... I will work on improving this tomorrow. [[User:SamuelA|SamuelA]] 20:03, 5 November 2008 (EST)
:Not going to enter the edit war unless I have to, but the article really should mention the beating (whether it was justified or not, there's no doubt that there was a beating, by four police officers, of one guy who was on the ground at the time. That's what caused the uproar, not the arrest). And while underlying factors made the riot possible, and maybe even inevitable, the acquittal was THE triggering event, and should be acknowedged as such.--[[User:Frey|Frey]] 09:41, 6 November 2008 (EST)