1
edit
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 257:
Line 257: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
no edit summary
:Presumably the "myth" part isn't the amount of energy it takes to raise livestock, but the fact that we should be eating less to combat climate change. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 13:56, 6 October 2008 (EDT)
:Presumably the "myth" part isn't the amount of energy it takes to raise livestock, but the fact that we should be eating less to combat climate change. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 13:56, 6 October 2008 (EDT)
==Clarification needed==
Not trying to "rip apart one by one" or anything, just hoping that whoever added the claims below could clarify them a bit.
"people today are more knowledgeable than in prior centuries."
:Knowledge as in the total knowledge of mankind or the knowledge of an average individual? Something else?
"an individuals sexual preference needs to be a protected civil right."
:Is this not an opinion? The source seems to be dead so I'm not quite sure about the context.
"atheists are just as moral as Christians who regularly go to a church, or, in some cases, atheists are morally superior."
:The article "[[moral]]" says: "each groups sees their sets of morals as supreme." Doesn't this sort of render the claim axiomatic, false if seen from Christian point of view, true if seen from atheist point of view?
"we should eat less red meat in order to combat climate change."
:The "we should" part sounds like an opinion again. How is it not?
"They claim that humans and apes have a common ancestor"
:I take it someone claims certainty, who? A theory certainly exists and, as far as I know, hasn't been proven false.
--[[User:Tmb|Tmb]] 11:32, 6 November 2008 (EST)