38
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 41:
Line 41: +
Talk:Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (view source)
Revision as of 22:46, November 6, 2008
, 22:46, November 6, 2008no edit summary
::::::::It isn't what? If you aren't here to collaborate, can you just go somewhere else? I'm trying to work with you here. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 16:51, 6 November 2008 (EST)
::::::::It isn't what? If you aren't here to collaborate, can you just go somewhere else? I'm trying to work with you here. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 16:51, 6 November 2008 (EST)
:::::::::I'm trying to be patient here, HelpJazz. A citation isn't needed. You may think it is, but you clearly aren't thinking too rationally at the moment. A citation isn't needed because the example you gave is erroneous. You wrote ''If he meant that ACORN contributed 1 or more votes fraudlently, as you read the sentence, then he needs a citation''. This doesn't need a citation because it is completely, transparently obvious that fraudulent votes obtained by this organisation were going to go totally or by overwhelming majority to Obama. Therefore one doesn't need a citation that Mr X. of Acacia Avenue voted fraudulently for Obama; the case is proven beyond reasonable doubt by the likelihood of the way the votes went. Enough. Finis. Fin. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 17:07, 6 November 2008 (EST)
:::::::::I'm trying to be patient here, HelpJazz. A citation isn't needed. You may think it is, but you clearly aren't thinking too rationally at the moment. A citation isn't needed because the example you gave is erroneous. You wrote ''If he meant that ACORN contributed 1 or more votes fraudlently, as you read the sentence, then he needs a citation''. This doesn't need a citation because it is completely, transparently obvious that fraudulent votes obtained by this organisation were going to go totally or by overwhelming majority to Obama. Therefore one doesn't need a citation that Mr X. of Acacia Avenue voted fraudulently for Obama; the case is proven beyond reasonable doubt by the likelihood of the way the votes went. Enough. Finis. Fin. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 17:07, 6 November 2008 (EST)
::::::::::But ACORN also took votes for McCain, not just Obama... soooooo fraud works for both sides?? At least include mcCain's campaign! (I still think a 2 day block would be nice for mini trumpet boy... the way he stalks and insults editors is really disturbing if you check his contributions T_T) [[User:Ema|Ema]] 17:46, 6 November 2008 (EST)