168
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 18:
Line 18: + +
Talk:Essay:Women wearing pants (view source)
Revision as of 23:22, November 6, 2008
, 23:22, November 6, 2008→Essay?
The history is a bit debatable - what are bloomers if not pants? And Audrey Hepburn was much later than 1857. [[User:Canuck|Canuck]] 00:04, 2 November 2008 (EDT)
The history is a bit debatable - what are bloomers if not pants? And Audrey Hepburn was much later than 1857. [[User:Canuck|Canuck]] 00:04, 2 November 2008 (EDT)
The whole thing reads more like a rant without much point than an essay. [[User:EternalCritic|EternalCritic]] 18:22, 6 November 2008 (EST)
== Other cultures ==
== Other cultures ==
In Punjab (both sides of the border), traditional clothing for women is a loose shirt and baggy trousers, known as shalwar-kamiz (shalwar is the trousers, kamiz the blouse). So to which culture(s) does your condemnation of trousers as clothing for women apply? To the USA? North America? Or more widely? [[User:DavyJones|DavyJones]] 18:52, 2 November 2008 (EST)
In Punjab (both sides of the border), traditional clothing for women is a loose shirt and baggy trousers, known as shalwar-kamiz (shalwar is the trousers, kamiz the blouse). So to which culture(s) does your condemnation of trousers as clothing for women apply? To the USA? North America? Or more widely? [[User:DavyJones|DavyJones]] 18:52, 2 November 2008 (EST)