Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 305: Line 305:     
:::What does a law regarding minors have to do at all? Regardless, I'd like to see you cite this alleged "law" that classifies sodomy as illegal. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 16:34, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:::What does a law regarding minors have to do at all? Regardless, I'd like to see you cite this alleged "law" that classifies sodomy as illegal. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 16:34, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
: Hoji, he's probably right about his "state" having a law on the books banning sodomy.  Georgia didn't repeal its immediately after ''Lawrence v TEXAS'' either.  However, the sodomy law in his "state" will never be prosecuted again because any conviction is now ''per se'' unconstitutional.  I don't know where you come from, RightWolf, but Supreme Court precedent is binding on all lower courts and states.  It's not optional.
 +
: That said, I am deeply sorry for your brother, who was raped by a homosexual.  No doubt there are gay men who are bad men.  However, there are straight men who are bad men too.  Being gay doesn't make you a rapist anymore than being straight makes you a rapist.
 +
: And finally, sodomy laws protecting minors are still in place, just like statutory rape laws still exist...-[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 16:46, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
    
I personally believe in the First Ammendment, so any rule should be calefully thought out and clearly defined. --[[User:TimSvendsen|TimSvendsen]] 16:38, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
 
I personally believe in the First Ammendment, so any rule should be calefully thought out and clearly defined. --[[User:TimSvendsen|TimSvendsen]] 16:38, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
2,732

edits

Navigation menu