Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 27: Line 27:  
::::The big bang does not mention one proton becoming everything, since the big bang started with a point of energy. It is entirely possible that this energy came from nothing as things tend to do, hence why we have vacuum fluctuation models.  
 
::::The big bang does not mention one proton becoming everything, since the big bang started with a point of energy. It is entirely possible that this energy came from nothing as things tend to do, hence why we have vacuum fluctuation models.  
 
::::Im not disregarding the concept of infinity, I actually think that the most plausible timeline for God would be one which was infinitely long. I just think that there has to BE a timeline.- Barnes
 
::::Im not disregarding the concept of infinity, I actually think that the most plausible timeline for God would be one which was infinitely long. I just think that there has to BE a timeline.- Barnes
 +
 +
Well if god is existing as all, then he is also existing in a non-existence. Which is clearly...impossible. 2ndly, if god is everything, he is also the devil, and all the atheists in the world, he is existing in the evil that is in the world...which is impossible because god by a moral standard is benevolent and loves all his people...And we must also remember...God isn't proven to be everything in the world...if you want to go with simple claims then your argument is no better than the Islam yelling Allah is the god, and Allah is everything, or An atheist saying the FSM is everything and it is god, or me saying I am everything and I am god. If we dont need evidence any of these claims would work. If you dont realize it, ideas dont gain truth in numbers, it gains it with evidence, having billions of people follow your religion doesn't mean its right, at one point in time most people thought the world was flat. At one point in time we didn't know tobacco was bad...
 +
 +
And if you forget, For god to be timeless he doesn't play by the rules of time, which makes no sense because everything came into existence 6,000 years ago according to the bible. Logically time itself existed only then, so God can't be existing before then...unless he is living in a non-existance...which would make no sense because there is no recorded evidence of the non-existance...Its like saying there is something out there that we, nor the universe can have physical or mental contact, meaning it doesn't effect the universe whatsoever, but it exists, its undectectable and doesn't affect us in any way but its there. It can't be reached by us, but it can reach out to us, and its disguised as normal things that are actually the affects of that unknown thing. --Yes...that makes perfect sense. Or we can just say that things happen.
 +
[[User:ChillinBM]]
    
== I don't know, and nor do you ==
 
== I don't know, and nor do you ==
12

edits

Navigation menu