Changes

* ''Creationists read the Bible literally, whereas parts, such as the creation account, are really metaphor.''

* ''Creationists read the Bible literally, whereas parts, such as the creation account, are really metaphor.''

: Creationists reject that they read all the Bible literally, and accept that there is metaphor an other non-literal passages in the Bible.  Instead, they read the Bible the way it was meant to be understood, which in the case of the creation account, is as literal history.  See [[#Biblical exegesis|Biblical exegesis]] above and [[Creation week]] for more.

: Creationists reject that they read all the Bible literally, and accept that there is metaphor an other non-literal passages in the Bible.  Instead, they read the Bible the way it was meant to be understood, which in the case of the creation account, is as literal history.  See [[#Biblical exegesis|Biblical exegesis]] above and [[Creation week]] for more.

* ''Evolution has scientific evidence, and creationism does not.''

* ''Evolution has scientific evidence, such as the fact that carbon dating has shown some rocks to be millions and some times billions of years old, and creationism does not.''

: Both creationists and evolutionists have the same evidence.  The difference is in how that evidence is interpreted.

: Both creationists and evolutionists have the same evidence.  The difference is in how that evidence is interpreted.

* ''Creation relies on faith, not evidence.''

* ''Creation relies on faith, not evidence.''