Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 674: Line 674:     
No one else can come up with anything close to a 90% voting correlation except where there is religious or ethnic identity.  Scientifically and objectively, that is noteworthy.  There are a dozen more compelling pieces of evidence, but that does not mean this data point is not suggestive also.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:26, 10 November 2008 (EST)
 
No one else can come up with anything close to a 90% voting correlation except where there is religious or ethnic identity.  Scientifically and objectively, that is noteworthy.  There are a dozen more compelling pieces of evidence, but that does not mean this data point is not suggestive also.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:26, 10 November 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
:I have been utterly truthful in what I have said.  You appear to have missed the point.
 +
 +
:In order for there to have been causation (i.e. Obama's being a Muslim caused Muslims to vote for him) the Muslims would necessarily have to ''know'' (not just suspect) that Obama is a Muslim.  In order for that to be the case there would need to be a vast conspiracy. 
 +
 +
:Pretty simple really.  Can you tell us what you know about this secret conspiracy?  --[[User:HGridley|HGridley]] 17:33, 10 November 2008 (EST)
9

edits

Navigation menu