Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 750: Line 750:     
::We ought to be clear on the standards by which we judge public figures. And consistent, too. I mean, which is worse, committing actual adultery (JFK, Clinton) or getting divorced and then remarrying? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 08:06, 12 November 2008 (EST)
 
::We ought to be clear on the standards by which we judge public figures. And consistent, too. I mean, which is worse, committing actual adultery (JFK, Clinton) or getting divorced and then remarrying? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 08:06, 12 November 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
::: Biblically, divorce is not adultery.  However, divorce is wrong unless the spouse has been unfaithful.  Remarriage after a legitimate divorce is okay.  The question is whether remarriage after a wrong divorce is okay.  Many believe, I think that although the act of divorce may be wrong, that is a forgivable sin like any other sin, and remarriage is not a further sin.  And I'd tend to agree that committing "actual" adultery is worse than divorce and remarriage.  However, the point that Conservative was raising was not between those two cases, but between divorce and remarriage compared to marriage without divorce.
 +
::: I'm not convinced that Obama's marriage does not constitute a "clear personal achievement".  Given the divorce rate these days, especially among prominent people, I would think that it ''was'' a clear personal achievement.  In fact I'd consider staying marriage a "clear personal achievement" for anybody these days, given all the pressures on marriage, including the peer pressure that divorce is okay.
 +
::: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:35, 12 November 2008 (EST)
nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254

edits

Navigation menu