Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 32:
Line 32: + +
cure for bias?
:Did you happen to notice the name of the site you are editing? [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 21:23, 10 November 2008 (EST)
:Did you happen to notice the name of the site you are editing? [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 21:23, 10 November 2008 (EST)
::Biased towards pro-choice?? That's crazy. Read it again. It's heavily biased ''against'' the pro-choice movement. [[User:Sideways|Sideways]] 08:58, 12 November 2008 (EST)
::Biased towards pro-choice?? That's crazy. Read it again. It's heavily biased ''against'' the pro-choice movement. [[User:Sideways|Sideways]] 08:58, 12 November 2008 (EST)
If by "biased against" you mean it only gave the anti-choice POV, then you're right - especially after my big intro edit just now. A more balanced treatment would explain the reasoning given by pro-choicers for their position; not just the reasons given by pro-lifers against 'choice'. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 09:06, 12 November 2008 (EST)