Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,411
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 378:
Line 378: + + + +
Compromise. I put a link for you
I knew you were referring to the Dino article. I skimmed the Loch Ness monster material before you sent your note. What is your beef with the Loch Ness monster? I really haven't researched the Loch Ness monster issue. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 18:55, 21 March 2007 (EDT)conservative
I knew you were referring to the Dino article. I skimmed the Loch Ness monster material before you sent your note. What is your beef with the Loch Ness monster? I really haven't researched the Loch Ness monster issue. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 18:55, 21 March 2007 (EDT)conservative
== Compromise. I put a link for you ==
Dpbsmith, I briefly looked into the whole Loch Ness Monster issue. I think the best way to handle it is to provide a sentence saying some people think Nessy is credible and then provide a sentence saying some people don't. Each sentence should have links/footnotes so people can decide for themselves. I am not too interested in the whole Nessy debate but I wanted to be fair to you. I created an internal link in the Dino article. By that I mean, I created a [[Loch Ness Monster]] link. You can have at that article which links to the Dino article. Out of that article I think will come the best "pro" and "con" links. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:38, 21 March 2007 (EDT)conservative