18
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 85:
Line 85: − − ''"4. We do not attempt to be neutral to all points of view. We are neutral to the facts. If a group is a terrorist group, then the label "terrorist" is used here but not on Wikipedia."'' − − I find it comical that you think this encyclopaedia is neutral. Conservapedia is anything but neutral. I was going to create/edit a few articles according to the commandments, but as I was looking through various articles I noticed that they all seem to be biased towards one point of view. I will try and help the encyclopedia, respecting the rules and opinions here, but it seems to be quite hard to write from a point of view that you don't necessarily agree with rather than a neutral point of view.
Conservapedia talk:How Conservapedia Differs from Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 23:41, March 21, 2007
, 23:41, March 21, 2007→Neutral? Censorship?
== Neutral? Censorship? ==
== Neutral? Censorship? ==
''"3. We do not allow obscenity, while Wikipedia has many entries unsuitable for children. "''
''"3. We do not allow obscenity, while Wikipedia has many entries unsuitable for children. "''