1,719 bytes added
, 12:07, November 14, 2008
It's easy to see how the UC view of marriage contrasts with the "[[gay marriage]]" idea of homosexuality proponents. Besides the fact that UC marriage is clearly limited to [[heterosexual marriage|one man and one woman]], its purpose is for the larger whole. While [[gay rights]] activists pursue the "same privileges" for homosexual couples as for real married couples, they completely ignore their responsibility to society.
In fact, the entire [[gay marriage]] campaign is a sham. Homosexual couples do not practice monogamy or chastity. They just live together like any other unmarried couple. Domestic violence and cheating are even worse in the homosexual community than in the heterosexual world. Around 5 to 10 times worse, if I recall the statistics correctly.
When the UC calls them out on this, they respond with outrage - rather than doing or saying anything to disprove the charges. Their militancy will only increase if [[hate speech]] laws are passed in the US.
Suppose you insult a man's wife, and he hits you (knocking you down). It would be hard for you to press charges against him for assualt (see [[fighting words]]. Imagine that you saw a same-sex embrace or kiss in public and made a disparaging comment. If an argument ensued, and you were assaulted, your assailant would have the defense of calling your comment a "[[hate crime]]". Not to say that every gay-straight assault would be legal. But it would certainly have a chilling effect on comments.
It might even become illegal to make a public denunciation of homosexuality in general, even from a church pulpit. That would be the beginning of the end for American society. It would only spiral down into hell, like Sodom and Gomorrah.