237
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 917:
Line 917: + + + +
Talk:Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed (view source)
Revision as of 18:27, November 14, 2008
, 18:27, November 14, 2008→I do hope that we will see the other side of the argument about dishonesty: new section
There's more, but that's off the top of my head. I gotta watch the movie again. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 13:17, 3 November 2008 (EST)
There's more, but that's off the top of my head. I gotta watch the movie again. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 13:17, 3 November 2008 (EST)
== I do hope that we will see the other side of the argument about dishonesty ==
Like the fact that they were shopping the film to evolution experts like Dawkins and Meyers and Scott as crossroads after they had registered the domain ExpelledtheMovie.com , or the fact that they created a subsidiary in order to make this new film and disconnected in every measurable way from their parent company, obfuscating the history of films that they had been producing. Some people think that that sort of behavior is fair in documentary film making, going in under cover, obviously Scott and Meyers did not since they refused to be interviewed a second time. Who exactly does Rampart blame for the wrongdoings that they are supposed to have uncovered? --[[User:Brendanw|Brendanw]] 13:27, 14 November 2008 (EST)