30
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 32:
Line 32: + +
Talk:Reverse racism (view source)
Revision as of 21:04, November 14, 2008
, 21:04, November 14, 2008no edit summary
::It seems people are all worked up today at my posts. True, no race baiting page exists, did I not follow the proper rules when merge request? I am trying to be accomodating and I agree; racism where no racism exists, is not reverse racism. What do you want to hear from me? HelpMe HelpJazz --'''<font color="#6698FF">J</font><font color="#E41B17">p</font><font color="#F88017">a</font><font color="#347C17">t</font><font color="#A74AC7">t</font>'''<sup>[[User:Jpatt| ]]</sup> 17:38, 22 October 2008 (EDT)
::It seems people are all worked up today at my posts. True, no race baiting page exists, did I not follow the proper rules when merge request? I am trying to be accomodating and I agree; racism where no racism exists, is not reverse racism. What do you want to hear from me? HelpMe HelpJazz --'''<font color="#6698FF">J</font><font color="#E41B17">p</font><font color="#F88017">a</font><font color="#347C17">t</font><font color="#A74AC7">t</font>'''<sup>[[User:Jpatt| ]]</sup> 17:38, 22 October 2008 (EDT)
:::This page should be moved to "accusations of racism" or something similar. We can then have some content here about the proper meaning of reverse racism. [[User:Sideways|Sideways]] 08:03, 24 October 2008 (EDT)
:::This page should be moved to "accusations of racism" or something similar. We can then have some content here about the proper meaning of reverse racism. [[User:Sideways|Sideways]] 08:03, 24 October 2008 (EDT)
Can we save the question of whether Obama won the election because he was black for political historians and history books? I know race was probably a factor, but saying that he won solely because of his race (and that there was a certain decisive effect of his race) just makes us seem to be sore losers, and worse, idiots, when we most definately are not. [[User:WHurst]]