38
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2:
Line 2: + +
Talk:Scientific Theory of Evolution (view source)
Revision as of 00:18, March 22, 2007
, 00:18, March 22, 2007no edit summary
The compromise was talked about [http://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Creationism#Compromise:_Split_Articles|on the Creationism article] but has gained more support from other admins elsewhere. Would-be-blankers: please respect our group consensus and do not put your own opinion above that of a good number of admins and editors.-[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 20:17, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
The compromise was talked about [http://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Creationism#Compromise:_Split_Articles|on the Creationism article] but has gained more support from other admins elsewhere. Would-be-blankers: please respect our group consensus and do not put your own opinion above that of a good number of admins and editors.-[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 20:17, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
Evolution most certainly is not very controversial in the United States. A very very small fraction of the scientists who signed the discovery institute's petition against evolution have degrees in the life sciences, and the total number makes up a tiny fraction of scientists in the US. Court rulings in Dover show that legal precedent still sides with evolution. Additionally, the removal of ALL of the board members from the Dover board of education shows that the public there sides with evolution as well. The idea that there is any controversy at all is an overstatement lending power to a few dissident individuals stepping way from an enormous majority. --[[User:Charliemc86|Charliemc86]]