Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 400: Line 400:     
:3 copies of something instead of 2 is no increase in information.  I have 3 copies of a couple of books (I lend a lot), but I have no more information than if I only had 1 copy of them.  Switching existing information on or off is not gaining or losing information. [[User:LowKey|LowKey]] 23:25, 13 November 2008 (EST)
 
:3 copies of something instead of 2 is no increase in information.  I have 3 copies of a couple of books (I lend a lot), but I have no more information than if I only had 1 copy of them.  Switching existing information on or off is not gaining or losing information. [[User:LowKey|LowKey]] 23:25, 13 November 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
:: I agree completely. But imagine instead that those books were created the old-fashioned way (copied by hand, this is similar to the way DNA is copied) and there were some errors made in the copying (mutations) in your third copy of the book. What has happened? No information was lost, because you have already stated that the third copy is useless information-wise if it was the exact same as the others. The amount of information did not stay the same, because you now have a book that contains a different bit of information in it, and the information it would have had without copying errors is already in the other 2 books. If information was not lost and information did not stay the same, it must have increased!
 +
 +
:: What I said might be a little confusing, but the above scenario is far more similar to that of DNA.--[[User:JArneal|JArneal]] 18:21, 14 November 2008 (EST)
    
== Thank you ==
 
== Thank you ==
359

edits

Navigation menu