Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:     
::You're right, it's a great source.  Trust me Charlie.  We're on the same page.  Just I'm trying to work within this system as best as I can to stop them from slandering science.  It's not going so well :-) but this might be a step in the right direction.  Thanks for the cite, and I really appreciate your future contributions, and look forward to them!-[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 20:25, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
 
::You're right, it's a great source.  Trust me Charlie.  We're on the same page.  Just I'm trying to work within this system as best as I can to stop them from slandering science.  It's not going so well :-) but this might be a step in the right direction.  Thanks for the cite, and I really appreciate your future contributions, and look forward to them!-[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 20:25, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::I did a little editing on the last paragraph.  It's now something I'm happy with, but still mentions the controversy.  We'll see if there are any objections to it. --[[User:Charliemc86|Charliemc86]]
    
== Perhaps the problem is that the article fails to point out, ==
 
== Perhaps the problem is that the article fails to point out, ==
38

edits

Navigation menu