Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 198: Line 198:     
3. '''Is the case for Obama being a "liberal Christian" stronger or is the case of Obama being a Muslim stronger when the principle of total evidence being weighed is applied?'''  If you state the case is stronger for Obama being a Muslim, please defend your position by truly negating the strong evidence that he is a member of "liberal Christianity" and giving compelling evidence that he is a Muslim.  [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 10:45, 16 November 2008 (EST)
 
3. '''Is the case for Obama being a "liberal Christian" stronger or is the case of Obama being a Muslim stronger when the principle of total evidence being weighed is applied?'''  If you state the case is stronger for Obama being a Muslim, please defend your position by truly negating the strong evidence that he is a member of "liberal Christianity" and giving compelling evidence that he is a Muslim.  [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 10:45, 16 November 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
:I thought the two of you might enjoy reading [http://blog.beliefnet.com/stevenwaldman/2008/11/obamas-interview-with-cathleen.html this 2004 interview with Obama], where he discusses his faith, his baptism, and so forth.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 14:04, 16 November 2008 (EST)
1,837

edits

Navigation menu