nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 96:
Line 96: + + + +
Template talk:Liberalism (view source)
Revision as of 01:40, November 17, 2008
, 01:40, November 17, 2008→Switching auto-tag for category: new section
*Do what you will, HelpJazz. Ed has a bot than can do/undo anything in minutes, not hours. It is a simple matter to change the Cat to Liberal not Liberal'''s''' no? That way it would fit people and institutions, right? --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</font></sup> 19:14, 16 November 2008 (EST)
*Do what you will, HelpJazz. Ed has a bot than can do/undo anything in minutes, not hours. It is a simple matter to change the Cat to Liberal not Liberal'''s''' no? That way it would fit people and institutions, right? --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</font></sup> 19:14, 16 November 2008 (EST)
== Switching auto-tag for category ==
Seems fine to me, but would it not be far less work to simply re-name category Liberal'''s''' to Liberal? As I understand it, Jazz's objection was that Liberal'''s''' didn't fit with some article names, and simply dropping the "S" seems to be easier. I might be wrong. Adding yet another new category name seemed silly. --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</font></sup> 20:40, 16 November 2008 (EST)