Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Isn't this kind of redundant: So why do a POV fork?
Line 47: Line 47:     
:Charlie's got it, and the other article is humongous and managed by one admin - [[user:Conservative]].  So two problems - (1) I don't really want to mess with his turf, especially since we've had our conflicts, and, (2) merging it would be a lot of work and potentially offensive to people who like the old page.  I personally like the disambiguation solution.-[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 21:04, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:Charlie's got it, and the other article is humongous and managed by one admin - [[user:Conservative]].  So two problems - (1) I don't really want to mess with his turf, especially since we've had our conflicts, and, (2) merging it would be a lot of work and potentially offensive to people who like the old page.  I personally like the disambiguation solution.-[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 21:04, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
So why do a POV fork?  Aren't those usually discouraged?  And it's not like there aren't [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wikis a ton of other wikis out there], at least one of which will probably be less hostile to your version.  --[[User:Interiot|Interiot]] 21:37, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
    
== Paragraph sounds like it would be better on Evolutionism ==
 
== Paragraph sounds like it would be better on Evolutionism ==
1,971

edits

Navigation menu