1,106
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 12:
Line 12: + +
User talk:Ymmotrojam/Scientific Theory of Evolution (view source)
Revision as of 01:57, March 22, 2007
, 01:57, March 22, 2007no edit summary
: I think it's worth it. The goal is to have a copiously cited verifiable article on evolution to present as an alternative to Conservative's presentation. On any other cite, we'd fess up and say ours is correct. Here, we just want to "teach the controversy" and have it accepted. As a final solution, I thought that the disambiguation compromise was a good one. I think even [[user:Conservative]] didn't mind it - he didn't delete it a second time and I know he was online :-O. So I think it was gaining acceptance, and would work next time.-[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 21:55, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
: I think it's worth it. The goal is to have a copiously cited verifiable article on evolution to present as an alternative to Conservative's presentation. On any other cite, we'd fess up and say ours is correct. Here, we just want to "teach the controversy" and have it accepted. As a final solution, I thought that the disambiguation compromise was a good one. I think even [[user:Conservative]] didn't mind it - he didn't delete it a second time and I know he was online :-O. So I think it was gaining acceptance, and would work next time.-[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 21:55, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
:: I guess participation here is leaving more and more of a bad taste in my mouth. Pearls before swine and all that. Maybe I just need to give it a rest for a while. [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 21:57, 21 March 2007 (EDT)