4
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 57:
Line 57: + + + + + +
Talk:Environmentalist (view source)
Revision as of 00:07, November 18, 2008
, 00:07, November 18, 2008no edit summary
if I claimed to be a republican but voted for and believed in democratic veiws would I still be a republican?--[[User:Benburned|Benburned]] 00:18, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
if I claimed to be a republican but voted for and believed in democratic veiws would I still be a republican?--[[User:Benburned|Benburned]] 00:18, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
:A person can be 40% environmentalist with 60% dedicated to another agenda. Likewise it's not uncommon at all for crossover votes. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 14:43, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
:A person can be 40% environmentalist with 60% dedicated to another agenda. Likewise it's not uncommon at all for crossover votes. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 14:43, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
==Dominion over the Earth==
I have a simple question. As a university student studying environmental science, I feel that the preservation of our natural environment should be, as humans, one of our top priorities.
I must admit, I never went to church very often as a youth, and so my grasp of the Bible is a little shaky. What does it mean that people should 'dominion over the Earth', and how does this statement contradict with the philosophy of environmentalism? [[User:Daniels|DanielS]] 07:07 November 2008 (EDT)
==The religuion of nature==
==The religuion of nature==