120
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 385:
Line 385: + + + + + + + + + +
Talk:The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (view source)
Revision as of 05:10, November 18, 2008
, 05:10, November 18, 2008no edit summary
:That the reference to the controversy has been removed does not mean that it does not exist. And I take it you are not being serious with the name, as if names are voted upon by the greater community for inclusion. If you truly believe a name defines an entity, then you may wish to move to a different Democratic nation -- such as North Korea. While it is not the place of this site to say who is right, that there is a controversy is not a matter of debate. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 13:20, 31 October 2008 (EDT)
:That the reference to the controversy has been removed does not mean that it does not exist. And I take it you are not being serious with the name, as if names are voted upon by the greater community for inclusion. If you truly believe a name defines an entity, then you may wish to move to a different Democratic nation -- such as North Korea. While it is not the place of this site to say who is right, that there is a controversy is not a matter of debate. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 13:20, 31 October 2008 (EDT)
==History Section==
I started a history section, although it's all about Utah, as the bit about the Church before Utah is in the introduction. I'd like to turn it into a larger history section, hopefully going from the founding up to present day. I'm happy to write about the period from 1847-1890, I'm working off a paper I wrote in college about the "Mormon War" of 1857. My knowledge of the history of the church basically stops with the leaders finally coming out of hiding from federal marshals and issuing the "Manifesto," as this ended the federal government's fight with the Church.
So, I have two requests:
1.) Could someone help out with the history after 1890?
2.) I'm planning on moving the historical bit down from the introduction and into a history section. Could someone suggest an alternate introduction? Or would it be ok to say the same information twice?
I'm also going to source all the facts I put in the section, but it's 12:10 and time for bed now. [[User:ArnoldFriend|ArnoldFriend]] 00:10, 18 November 2008 (EST)