401
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 207:
Line 207: + + + +
→Market forces: new section
How can a reference back up an opinion with another opinion? Is there any proof of either of these claims? [[User:NateE|NateE]]<sup>[[User talk:NateE| Let Us Communicate]]</sup> 15:34, 10 October 2008 (EDT)
How can a reference back up an opinion with another opinion? Is there any proof of either of these claims? [[User:NateE|NateE]]<sup>[[User talk:NateE| Let Us Communicate]]</sup> 15:34, 10 October 2008 (EDT)
:Now that I've messed it all up, which ref were you talking about? [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 20:30, 10 October 2008 (EDT)
:Now that I've messed it all up, which ref were you talking about? [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 20:30, 10 October 2008 (EDT)
== Market forces ==
It should be considered that if there was no market for it then pornography (or erotica or anything else) would not exist. The fact that a very large part of the internet, content of mainstream movies, and "adult" publications , fairly clearly shows that there is a market for such material. Rather than fight to ban such materials (which is somewhat like prohibition , which didnt work very well) more effort in educating peoples to renounce them is needed. Its somewhat interesting that in polls no one admits to buying magazines like Playboy and yet it sells a lot of copies. Certainly those forms which are illegal should be prosecuted or some arrangement made to block access (if originating in another country). In the United States this subject is considered a First Amendment issue , the right of free expession. [[User:Markr|Markr]] 12:31, 18 November 2008 (EST)