Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
509 bytes added ,  19:53, November 18, 2008
Line 21: Line 21:     
This article both claims (incorrectly) that Clinton took no action against Bin Laden and also (correctly) claims that Bin Laden was targeted in a cruise missile strike. Both cannot be true.--[[User:Mrvipond|Mrvipond]] 10:39, 14 December 2007 (EST)
 
This article both claims (incorrectly) that Clinton took no action against Bin Laden and also (correctly) claims that Bin Laden was targeted in a cruise missile strike. Both cannot be true.--[[User:Mrvipond|Mrvipond]] 10:39, 14 December 2007 (EST)
 +
::The cruise missile attack was an attempt by Clinton to distract people from the Lewinsky scandal. It wasn't until after the Sept 11 attacks that Clinton started claiming Bin Laden had been the target.  Before then the justification was a series of vague references to "insurgents." The article should either drop the reference to the cruise missile attacks or clarify their relevance.  I vote for clarifying, because if the mention is dropped critics will claim we're censoring data. --[[User:AlexC|AlexC]]
    
== Death ==
 
== Death ==
    
Is it not worth also mentioning that there is a widespread belief that he is now dead. The broadcasts he supposedly made last year (the first for 3 years) were widely believed to be obvious fakes.
 
Is it not worth also mentioning that there is a widespread belief that he is now dead. The broadcasts he supposedly made last year (the first for 3 years) were widely believed to be obvious fakes.
62

edits

Navigation menu