:::::: I reject that the world was made last Thursday because I have a well-supported and consistent belief that God created the world 6,000 years ago, not because it's a "science stopper". I can't scientifically prove (an oxymoron anyway) that it wasn't created last Thursday, but I don't reject it on the grounds that it negates science. You, on the other hand, are essentially arguing that the idea that God created the world is wrong simply on the grounds of supposedly not being able to test it. That is not grounds for declaring something to be wrong. | :::::: I reject that the world was made last Thursday because I have a well-supported and consistent belief that God created the world 6,000 years ago, not because it's a "science stopper". I can't scientifically prove (an oxymoron anyway) that it wasn't created last Thursday, but I don't reject it on the grounds that it negates science. You, on the other hand, are essentially arguing that the idea that God created the world is wrong simply on the grounds of supposedly not being able to test it. That is not grounds for declaring something to be wrong. |