Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,790
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 3:
Line 3: − The second '''Conservapedia challenge''' is to find an independent lab capable of re-running the experiments outlined in Lenski's paper in order to either verify or disconfirm the paper's conclusions. This lab should be approved for handling strains of ''E. coli'' and will need to request the strains described in the paper.
Conservapedia challenge (view source)
Revision as of 15:58, November 20, 2008
, 15:58, November 20, 2008removed silly paragraph
The first '''Conservapedia challenge''' is to find a legal means for obtaining public disclosure of [[Lenski]]'s [[federally funded research|federally funded]] data.
The first '''Conservapedia challenge''' is to find a legal means for obtaining public disclosure of [[Lenski]]'s [[federally funded research|federally funded]] data.
[[Category:Conservapedia]]
[[Category:Conservapedia]]