6,786
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
User talk:GeorgePhillips (view source)
Revision as of 01:02, November 21, 2008
, 01:02, November 21, 2008New page: ==MJ== Some insight from Conservapedia's founder, Andy Schlafly: :"It's inherently unreliable and non-encyclopedic for a critic of a church to try to explain its doctrine. No encycloped...
==MJ==
Some insight from Conservapedia's founder, Andy Schlafly:
:"It's inherently unreliable and non-encyclopedic for a critic of a church to try to explain its doctrine. No encyclopedia should allow such an absurdity.--Aschlafly 16:17, 28 June 2008 (EDT)"
:"Anyone who has an ax to grind against a particular church (or group of church members) should not grind it here.--Aschlafly 17:15, 28 June 2008 (EDT)"
Based on your current edits, I feel you are violating this counsel, and your edits will be reverted. [[Image:User Fox.png|10px]] [[User:Fox|שועל]] <small>([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])</small> 20:02, 20 November 2008 (EST)
Some insight from Conservapedia's founder, Andy Schlafly:
:"It's inherently unreliable and non-encyclopedic for a critic of a church to try to explain its doctrine. No encyclopedia should allow such an absurdity.--Aschlafly 16:17, 28 June 2008 (EDT)"
:"Anyone who has an ax to grind against a particular church (or group of church members) should not grind it here.--Aschlafly 17:15, 28 June 2008 (EDT)"
Based on your current edits, I feel you are violating this counsel, and your edits will be reverted. [[Image:User Fox.png|10px]] [[User:Fox|שועל]] <small>([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])</small> 20:02, 20 November 2008 (EST)