Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 7:
Line 7: + +
Talk:William the Conqueror (view source)
Revision as of 13:41, November 21, 2008
, 13:41, November 21, 2008→Category: You are right.
Why UK history? Why not [[:Category:English History]]? There was no [[United Kingdom]] way back then, was there? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 07:59, 21 November 2008 (EST)
Why UK history? Why not [[:Category:English History]]? There was no [[United Kingdom]] way back then, was there? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 07:59, 21 November 2008 (EST)
::I agree we have a problem. I would MUCH prefer the term "British History" -- historians and reference books generally do not use "United Kingdom Histgory}. [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 08:33, 21 November 2008 (EST)
::I agree we have a problem. I would MUCH prefer the term "British History" -- historians and reference books generally do not use "United Kingdom Histgory}. [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 08:33, 21 November 2008 (EST)
I hereby empower you to use [[:Category:British History]] wherever it is needed. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 08:41, 21 November 2008 (EST)