Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1: −
In ''Alba v. Marietta Mem. Hosp.'', 2000-1 Trade Cas. (CCH) P72,774 (6th Cir. Jan. 6, 2000), the Court of Appeals for the [[Sixth Circuit]] rendered a decision against plaintiff that was supportive of a plaintiff's right to obtain [[discovery]] of confidential documents used in [[peer review]].
+
In '''''Alba v. Marietta Mem. Hosp.''''', 2000-1 Trade Cas. (CCH) P72,774 (6th Cir. Jan. 6, 2000), the Court of Appeals for the [[Sixth Circuit]] rendered a decision against plaintiff that was supportive of a plaintiff's right to obtain [[discovery]] of confidential documents used in [[peer review]].
    
The underlying facts arose from the curtailment of Dr. Alba's surgical privileges by the hospital, and his subsequent legal challenge to that [[peer review]] action.  Ultimately the federal courts ruled against Dr. Alba and rejected his claims.
 
The underlying facts arose from the curtailment of Dr. Alba's surgical privileges by the hospital, and his subsequent legal challenge to that [[peer review]] action.  Ultimately the federal courts ruled against Dr. Alba and rejected his claims.
5

edits

Navigation menu